Modern Civil Society Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

upstart Civil Society - Essay ExampleHe believed that success meant leading a state of temperament to civil society however, the idea of combining every man who is free creates an agreement between people, and thusly government is needed. Rousseau believed that people should give up some of their liberties and be governed in order to provide their watch got safety and other social benefits, yet Arendt has explained the disadvantages of government who have taken total control of their people. eyepatch Arendt and Rousseau both agree that slavery is an in gentlemans gentlemane system, they have different views on people being controlled by the government. According to Arendt, the Nazis dehumanized and exterminated Jews by having the idea that everything is possible and everything is permitted. Once the idea had been formed, the purposes of concentration and extermination camps were designed to exterminate and reduce a kind of human being into an almost nonexistent species. downst airs total terror power control, these people who were in the camps often considered keeping themselves alive instead of fighting for freedom, which led them to start losing their thinking skills and began building up their abilities to obey. After the victims began losing their human behavior and their own personalities, they had been skilled as Pavlovs dog, which, as we know, was trained to eat non when it was hungry only if when a buzzer rang (Arendt 124). In the essay, Arendt stated that under the terror, those human beings had been turned into a mere thing, into something that even animals are not (124). In other newss, Arendt stated that by classifying human beings, Nazis saw Jews as trifling matter who have been treated as if they no longer existed, as if what happened to them were no longer of any interest to anybody, as if they were already dead (132). They did not treat Jews as human beings, and surely they disregard Jews lives. Rousseau had a uniform idea, arguing t hat no one is natural to be a slave, and every human being is natural equally and only they can choose their destiny Far earlier, Aristotle, too, had maintained that men are not by nature equal, but that some are born to be slaves, others to be masters. Aristotle was right but he mistook the effect for the cause. Nothing is more certain than that a man born into a check over of slavery is by nature. A slave in fetters loses everythingeven the desire to be freed from them. He grows to distinguish his slavery (61). According to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, some people are naturally slaves however, others are naturally masters. In other words, a slave is born to be owned by another human being, and has no freedom they even lose their opportunity to be set free from their owner. However, by defining the word natural, Rousseau explained that the nature for a human being is the idea that all men are born free, which means that all people have natural freedom, including slaves. He claimed that it is ridiculous for a newborn human being to spend a lifetime as a slave, which might mean being locked up with the owner in poor conditions and forced to work for hardly any profit. Furthermore, Rousseau believed that a man could be born in the position of a slave, but the man must have his natural liberty that belongs to himself and only he has the right to decide his destiny. Arendt and Rousseau both had similar ideas that racism and slavery are painful actions that should not